Sarah’s Not So Sexy Sequel…

sex

Really, SARAH JESSICA PARKER? Really?!?

Is that what people are really looking for? Another two hours of high couture banality with your well-preserved crew of aging tarts. I’m embarrassed and saddened that you and your lady friends became the ‘Golden Girls’ right in front of my eyes. Not that the ‘Golden Girls’ wasn’t an enjoyable program in that cliché way that sitcoms become, but why should the ‘Golden Girls’ have more “shuzzz” than your group?

It is the fault of your producers, writers and designers SARAH JESSICA. It was time to jettison that bunch of behind the scenes flunkies that have no more fire and transition to a team with more flavor than a pair of KIM CATTRALL’s crotchless panties. People want to see these old bitches wanting to have sex, or having sex and then talking about it afterwards, with the same ladies room wit that made the series worth a damn in the first place. Otherwise you should just let Disney produce these movies from now on. Instead of making a sequel to SATC how about you give Ferris Bueller whatever he wants?

I used to fuck with ‘Sex & The City’ so hardbody because I always wanted me a white as cool as those ho’s were. The only white I ever dated were always jungle fever fetish jobs who would not have given a rat’s ass that I loved comic books, cartoons and physics. Them bitches just wanted to go on a safari and do the jungle love (yes Morris Day). I could give you a safari if I wanted to, but I was tired of the safari shit. The jungle is limited in what animal you can portray. I love playing outerspace because it has no limits. Plus I always liked being an asstronutt.

What is ironic and beautiful is that my lady was raised in the center of the jungle on Halsey between Bedford and N.A. and all she likes to do is play outerspace games. My white girl is actually a Black girl with every track from Depeche Mode’s ‘Music For The Masses’ committed to memory. MFTM is so classic and so important since it was released on my birthday. Yeah, it was always all about me after all. ‘Sex & The City’ doesn’t deserve a sequel because it has no soul.

Its become masturbation as a routine. Just ask Ferris Bueller. Bueller? Bueller?

11 Responses to “Sarah’s Not So Sexy Sequel…”

  1. Gee says:

    While I have never watched a segment of SITC, I have actually memorized SEVERAL scenes from FBDO….I don’t do Jimmy Chooo’s or Manolo Blahniks when I live vicariously….

  2. 40 says:

    I hate this franchise… I do like Kristin Davis (Charlotte). This show singlehandedly dumbed down alot of women by feeling the need they needed to identify with one of the characters while they were out in packs. To the point I’d be at a corporate happy hour and ask them which one of the four they thought they were (and always hoped they were cougarific milfy Samantha types just for the easy vic).

    I think in these dour economic times the mere premise of this movie needs to be roundly rejected by people. Because the lifestyle and behavior encouraged in this movie helped contribute to the current economic crisis. It was made cool and edgy to cut other expenses close because you “needed” a pair of $700 shoes. Man eff these dysfunctional hoes.

    DP I like 40 something white women as much as the next retired NFL’er but between this and Madonna I’m just not knowing where this is coming from. I’d rather take 80 year old Julie Newmar than Madonna at this point…

  3. the_dallas says:

    40D,
    I been on my white woman itch for a quick minute. Shit flare up in a nigga like herpes. You must be crazy out your brain to act like you would pass up a night with Madonna. She can make those two girls with the one cup look like rookies in the game.

    I don’t think an effed up economy means that we can’t watch ho’s stunt hard in fly shit but when SATC was a trendsetter now it has become just a name dropper. Step your style game up bitches! Hire Piper Carter to make you look fresh.

    Kristin Davis was such a banger until I found out how married she was. Blechhh.

  4. EloheemStar says:

    Kristin Davis got body! For Hollywood standards anyway. My lady got me….aww let me stop lying.. I watched the show religously for the first two seasons then the writing got clich’e. I didnt see the movie I knew it was going to be fumier.

  5. the_dallas says:

    They never dealt with rape on that show. Too bad.

  6. Combat Jack says:

    ^ “They never dealt with rape on that show. Too bad.”

    WTF is you kneegrows talking the eff about 2day!?! Yeah, SATC the series was banging, excellent writing and all. Didn’t eff with the movie though. Plus, made me appreciate the media more for taking a fugly chick like Sarah and making her appear “cute” and “sexy”. Yeah she’s “cute” and “sexy”, but that biyatch is effin ugly.

    Btw, I was on line at a coffee shop last month in Park Slope. Cynthia Nixon was on line in front of me with her kid (isn’t she gay?). Without the cameras and makeup, magazine covers and TMZ, at like 9am in the morning, she straight up looked like a VERY ugly man.

    I have never been attracted to white broads, unless you consider spanish broads white.
    I’m saying.

  7. Tiffany says:

    “Cynthia Nixon was on line in front of me with her kid (isn’t she gay?).”

    Yes CJ. Left her husband and children to become someone else’s husband and have children w/her.

    I like SATC!!!

  8. Shout to the Royal Rib House, Halsey & Throop.

    Combat Jack: Spanish broads are definitely NOT white, tho’ sometimes they might be Irish– it’s a Catholic thing, even if the Micks are scared shitless of Santeria.

    Re: SATC, I never watched the show of own volition, just once while getting it in with a Park Slope white in 1998 or 1999? She was sold textbooks to schools or something like that and actually knew her way around BK, like I’d say hey, hit Armondo’s Pizza if you’re in Canarsie or A&A Doubles on Nostrand in the Stuy and she’d actually have half-a-clue. Anyhoo, this gal was SATC fanatic so I was compelled to sit through it once on the way to her head game: she was one of those who’ll do everything BUT because that’s more “personal” or whatever but by the time you get there it’s already too annoying.

    TMD

  9. Candice says:

    SATC was a great show when it started. For a single white woman living in Manhattan, it focused on four “types” and their dating rituals. It was groundbreaking in that it showed the free-spirited type who hates relationships and just wants to get hers, the uptight attorney/business woman, the dreamer who wants a husband and the cool chick who seemingly has it all but can’t find the right guy.

    Women were able to identify with these broads, plus it had the fashion and style of NYC.

    At this point? I don’t see where the story can go. The movie wrapped up a whole lot of loose ends so what’s left?

    I think Hollywierd is ruining the franchise and trying to get blood from a stone. How about coming up with a new concept?

  10. infamous says:

    ‘This show singlehandedly…’

    …ruined New York City. Well, maybe Friends and Seinfeld helped a little, too, but, come on.

    Plus, are people really gonna be into watching a movie with these women twitting about $2100 shoes when they’re living Great Depression II:The Sequel. I’m guessing…not.

  11. Farouq Obama aka Fux says:

    I never watched because I dont fuck with white people very often outside the work setting and I will watch a girl show only if I am attracted to the bitches(word to 90210). I fuck with True Blood though….the black broad on there is so fucking official …DP look her up

Leave a Reply