Would You Trust This Man With Your Children?

bo

Don’t think that anything that comes from the mouth of president OBAAMA isn’t political.

But for you to give this man a hard time for delivering a message of self-reliance and the importance of education is to be as anti-futuristic and dare I say anti-American. President OBAAMA is playing political chess and what we are looking at the capture of the bishop.

16 Responses to “Would You Trust This Man With Your Children?”

  1. crisis says:

    man people can be dumb

  2. crisis says:

    also, remember the difference between POLITICS and POLITRIX

  3. 1969 says:

    Yes he has an agenda but after reading the speech….he isn’t saying anything except stay in school, work hard and focus. What’s wrong with that?

  4. mercilesz says:

    Dallas Im gonna say it right now. This man will not be re-elected. He is more Bush than Bush and he is not a politician. He gives too many concessions to the republican party and always wants to bargain.The democrats are in power right now and he has no reason to do this. He just increased military spending in Africa and Afghanistan and wont even speak up on the Blackwater Mercenaries in iraq. The republicans play hardball and he doesn’t. Hes soft. The only reason he is in office is because both parties wanted to put a black face on american imperialism. Black snake or White snake….still a snake. Im going to the university now. everybody be cool.

  5. Amadeo says:

    I’d disagree for one simple reason…who’s going to beat him? Palin, Cheney, Jindal? I can’t even think of a democrat that’s ready to step up.

  6. Lion XL says:

    First of all, fuck all the nay sayers, and bitch asses talking about socialism, etc. Since when is trying to get the youth involved in politics and the growth of the country as socialism? When Bush went on and on about points of light, no one called that socialism. Nobody said shit when every other president (and their WIVES, remember Nancy Reagan an her ‘JUST SAY NO’ campaign.) went to the schools to spread their agenda. Hate to sound ignorant, but more of the MAN, trying to keep us ignorant. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    And @Mercilez, yeah it seems like he is giving away concessions, but when you are trying to bring the country AWAY from bi-partisan politics, and get everyone on-board for change, this is what needs to be done. Can’t really re-build a country/economic system if every one is opposed.

  7. Mark Dub says:

    Well said, Lion XL

  8. mercilesz says:

    Lion thats one way to look at it. I respect that view. But he needs to exercise that power he has just as Roosevelt did to get Social Security and Johnson did to get Medicare and Medicaid. Those two democrats were like fuck what the republicans want…Ima do this for my country right now and my parents as well as other peoples parents are benefiting from that legislation as we speak. exercise ur power dude stop conceding….

  9. Amadeo says:

    The difference is Roosevelt and Johnson were just white dudes with a different political view. These cats act like it’s Armageddon everytime he does ANYTHING. The truth of politics is protecting the office of those who can support you. I don’t think it’s so much trying to get republicans on board as considering democrats who are at risk in their next elections. From a “life is now” stand point I feel you. From a political standpoint…once some of these elections go by I think he’ll start pushing harder.

  10. VEe says:

    “Those two democrats were like fuck what the republicans wantโ€ฆ”
    I understand hardball politics, “I won,” my party is in power, is the modus operandi but hopefully that outlook will eventually change.

    Although I doubt it.

    With all the smear campaigns, misinformation being diseminated . . . and the ridiculous controversy surrounding a speech informing children to stay in school, who knows what will happen in the next 3 years. With that said, I would be surprised if he is re-elected.

    -mercilesz . . . he’s definitely a lot like Bush in some ways. At least Laura Bush has been a vocal supporter of this administration.

  11. mercilesz says:

    You know(thinking)…most of the hate he endures isnt even because of his policies. He hasn’t done anything that Bush hasn’t done. It comes from hateful media like fox and these talk radio dudes who don’t know anything about history or government.they are reacting to his color.uninformed white america loves to look at color so they actually believe the nonsense they see read and hear. I believe there is no such thing as a democrat or republican and they are both the same political party. I believe they wanted to put a new face on american imperialism so bad they put sarah paylin in the mix…meaning they put the dumbest white person they could find in the race that even an american would vote for a black man. This was orchestrated by “both” parties and it worked. the US government is based on the roman senate where one party was the plebian and the other the patrician.the pleb was thought to be for the poor and the patrician for the rich.the pleb worked for the poor by passing a little legislation here and there while the patrician was always in favor of the rich. unlike our system they always had an even number of members of both parties and the system seemed to be even to the observer.However the pleb and patrician always worked together when it came to land distribution food distribution wealth distribution and in times of war. Somehow things never changed in Rome.The rich got richer and the poor stayed poor.The pleb party was put in the senate to keep the poor docile by making them think they had a voice in government. This is the system of the US government verbatim.Its a trick to make you think you have a choice by voting a certain way.Its GENIOUS.One more thing for those who dont believe that there is only one party. Republican in Latin means “Rule by the people”. Democrat in Greek means…ta daaa “Rule by the people”. But most Americans dont read so they will never find this out.

  12. Lion XL says:

    @Mercilez….they may mean the same thing, but that doesn’t mean they ARE the same thing…..what they mean is not what they have grown to represent (sort like the word NIGGA!! ๐Ÿ˜‰ )

    Demaocrats traditionally have represented the ‘POOR’ and ‘MIDDLE CLASS’, while the republicans represented every one else. Thing about it is, the republicans worked real hard to keep the status quo, while the ‘MIDDLE CLASS’ shrunk and and the ‘POOR’ proliferated.

    BTW….I fully agree with the Palin thing. There is no way they didn’t know Palin was a cheese head! They knew where the country was heading, why not bailout and let the democrats try to fix it? Regroup for 4 years and comeback strong. It works in the NBA.

  13. mercilesz says:

    My dude Lion. They are the same thing. one name(democrat) baits you into believing you have a voice to keep u docile and the other(republican) knows you don’t. Johnson who signed the civil rights bill kept the war in Vietnam going for years and sent black people into the war disproportionately.When Ertha Kitt asked him why we were fighting she was blacklisted from Hollywood until Boomerang. The Crats give the poor crumbs so they feel they have representation and the Republicans and the Crats know the poor don’t.Its roman poliTrix at its finest. Why do you think Kerry(a former war hero btw)let them slander him when Bush didnt even go to Vietnam.Why do u think Gore didnt ask for a recount.These two names of parties are both for the elite and both voted for every war we have been in since Korea. The purpose of the Democratic party is to disable the poor vote in the U.S. This is why Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and Calvin Butts are on the payroll of the democratic party. When they get their church members to vote for the democratic party they are effectively negating their vote. Even More so getting black people to vote democratically every year pushes poor white people away from the party who would actually benefit them because u and I both Know uninformed people look at color 1st. Just look at what is happening to Obama now. Its Roman politics with an added factor….Race. And it works.

  14. mercilesz says:

    Oh one last thing Im sorry. When Marie Antoinette said let them eat cake or bread or whatever she said, The poor revolted and changed the whole political system. This system like the roman is designed to fool you into thinking you at least have a chance. This is why Obama always talked about Change. Well if they “want their america back” so bad. Why did so many non blacks vote for change.

  15. Lion XL says:

    @mercilez, not keep going this much longer, as we probably agree anyway….but redo your research. There is a difference between a REPUBLIC and the REPUBLICAN PARTY.

    A REPUBLIC is governmental system, A DEMOCRACY is a form of a republican system, as is a FREE STATE, as is COMMON WEALTH, as is a PEOPLES REPUBLIC, as is a PARLIAMENTARY REPUBLIC.

    The REPUBLICAN PARTY , and the DEMOCRATIC PARTY, are just NAMES to represent the the different political stances of the two major political parties.

    BTW, do you realize that the original Republicans were very much anti-slavery? …from a economical stance, not a humanitarian stance.

  16. mercilesz says:

    yep i know that. I agree to disagree with u and thats cool,however rex public means the public is king and that means rule by the people and democracy also means rule by the people and there is no getting around that. The fundamental theory that I was trying to get u and others to see is that the people in this country can vote all they want but will never rule. A common wealth doesnt even mean what it says…jamaica did not share in british wealth but it did give all of its wealth to Britain who you mentioned as a parliamentary republic. The British were playing this word game just as well as the US and oppressed just as many people while talking sideways.

Leave a Reply